<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Railway transport en Tenerife</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garciabarba.com/cppa/transporte-ferroviario-en-tenerife/feed/?lang=en" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garciabarba.com/cppa/transporte-ferroviario-en-tenerife/?lang=en</link>
	<description>Pagina de divulgación de la oficina de arquitectura</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 09:23:16 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<sy:updateperiod>hourly</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>1</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Ivan Bolanos</title>
		<link>http://www.garciabarba.com/cppa/transporte-ferroviario-en-tenerife/?lang=en#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Ivan Bolanos</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Mon, 16 May 2011 19:27:22 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.garciabarba.com/cppa/?p=70#comment-144-en</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good afternoon. Interesting reflection, D. Federico García. The idea of ​​replacing the high speed train designed by a commuter train seems like a good idea, by the higher number of stops would. At the end of the, local people and visitors would be the users of this infrastructure, thus increasing the number of stops would be beneficial. In the new infrastructure should prevail as environmental integration with the territory and reducing gaseous contamination levels, Sound, light, etc.. Hoy en día utilizamos el vehículo privado porque estimamos que nos aporta más &quot;libertad&quot; and that leads us directly to our destination, but then we find that there are many problems to save: parking, fuel cost, vehicle maintenance (reviews, insurance, mechanical traction tax, tires, etc.) Thus, si la nueva infraestructura asegura esa &quot;libertad&quot; the population, have great reception.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good afternoon. Interesting reflection, D. Federico García. The idea of ​​replacing the high speed train designed by a commuter train seems like a good idea, by the higher number of stops would. At the end of the, local people and visitors would be the users of this infrastructure, thus increasing the number of stops would be beneficial. In the new infrastructure should prevail as environmental integration with the territory and reducing gaseous contamination levels, Sound, light, etc.. Today we use private vehicles because we believe it gives us more &#8220;freedom&#8221; and that leads us directly to our destination, but then we find that there are many problems to save: parking, fuel cost, vehicle maintenance (reviews, insurance, mechanical traction tax, tires, etc.) Thus, if the new infrastructure ensures that &#8220;freedom&#8221; the population, tendrá gran acogida.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
